Thursday, August 21, 2008 |
|
Little Pink Houses for You and Me ... |
|
Posted by:
Matt Lewis at
1:38 PM |
Carol, Amanda and Hugh have written on this.
But I thought it was also worth noting that McCain did the interview in New Mexico. That’s a swing state. More to the point, Las Cruces (where I believe the interview took place) is situated in an important part of the state. Shouldn’t Martin and Allen have been asking why McCain thinks he’ll appeal there, or about issues that matter there? That would have been, perhaps, a more substantive thing to focus on, as opposed to the "gotcha" nature of the housing question ...
|
|
|
Thursday, August 21, 2008 |
|
Questions of the Day: How Many Houses Has Bill Ayers Blown Up? Is Obama Prompter-Dependent? |
|
Posted by:
Hugh Hewitt at
12:34 PM |
Rush played some tape of Obama attempting to turn John McCain's answer on the number of houses he owns into a stump speech. Rush correctly noted that it sounded very desperate indeed, and given the news that Rush also reported that Obama is using a prompter at "townhalls," raises the question of whether there's quality control at the input end.
Letting surrogates chew on McCain's wealth may or may not be a good idea --class rhetoric rarely works, especially when you have John Kerry as your nominee emeritus-- but it is especially dangerous when your own home was acquired with the connivance of a convicted felon to whom you had helped direct subsidies as a state legislator.
Since houses are in play, we also need to know:
How many houses does nancy Pelosi own? Harry Reid? And how many houses has Bill Ayers blown up or plotted to blow up?
|
|
|
Thursday, August 21, 2008 |
|
Elitism is a State of Mind |
|
Posted by:
Carol Platt Liebau at
12:05 PM |
Ok, ok -- John McCain isn't sure how many properties he and his wife own. But before the Democrats get carried away, it's worth noting that they are poorly positioned to argue that McCain is too rich to be President.
In fact, according to the Center for Responsive Politics, as of 2006, seven of the ten richest people in Congress were Democrats. And in the Senate, the six richest senators were Democrats. The very richest? Why, their 2004 nominee John Kerry -- with an average net worth of $205 million. McCain, with an average of $26 million, is a relative pauper.
What's more, Hillary Clinton (average $30 million) is richer than John McCain -- so it's a little hypocritical for the Dems to be portraying McCain as some sort of guy who's too rich to be President, isn't it? A few votes the other way in a few key states, and the "rich" candidate would have been theirs . . .
Ultimately, elitism isn't about one's money. It's about attitude and ego. Most of the left-wing academics at elite universities are total elitists -- and they don't have anything near the earning capacity of, say, professional athletes or country music stars (many of whom tend to lean right).
Elitism isn't about the price of one's clothes or house -- or the number of either. It's John Kerry's obvious Francophilia -- and Barack Obama's interest in the price of arugula, penchant for describing working class voters as "bitter", and willingness to believe that voters' cynicism and blindness are the only reasons he's not winning this thing in a walk. It's Barack's embarassment that his fellow Americans can't speak French when they visit France, and his obvious discomfort and disagreement with the idea of American exceptionalism. It's about seeming more excited to proclaim oneself a "citizen of the world" than a citizen of the USA.
In any case, isn't it possible that McCain doesn't know precisely how many properties he and his wife own because that's just not his primary interest and focus?
All this is just revealing of the Democrats' tired old use of the class warfare card. As McCain said at Saddleback, it's his hope that everyone can be rich. Here's to all of us having so many houses we can't keep 'em straight -- rather than trying to stir up resentment against those who own them, like the Democrats.
|
|
|
Thursday, August 21, 2008 |
|
Hillary Veep Speculation |
|
Posted by:
Matt Lewis at
11:47 AM |
I got this email from a Townhall reader who is a Hillary booster:
"I think all these trial balloons are just a distraction. He doesn't need to vet her (very much) because its already been done. She already has a Wed. speaking spot which is normally the day for the VP, so it's convenient while also being suspicious. I'm sick of hearing that he won't do it because of Bill. If Obama is smart enough to be president then he should be smart enough to figure out what to do with Bill. He's going to be dealing with leaders tougher than that. All of the VP names that are being tossed around have their downsides. She's the only one that could really give him the boost he needs. There are still nearly 25% of Clinton supporters pledging not to vote for him. I'd say the campaign is in panic mode right now. But it could be someone that hasn't even been mentioned. Either way, I think we are being set up for a surprise."
|
|
|
Thursday, August 21, 2008 |
|
Club for Growth Disappointed with GOP Convention Lineup |
|
Posted by:
Matt Lewis at
11:33 AM |
The Club for Growth issued a press release today on the convention lineup. Here is an excerpt:
"With the Republican Party’s brand in shambles, it is important for the Party to showcase those leaders who are currently in office fighting to preserve the limited-government, free-market principles the GOP used to stand for.
In the Senate, Tom Coburn and Jim DeMint have waged a two-man war on wasteful spending. In the House of Representatives, conservative leaders like Jeff Flake (AZ-06), John Shadegg (AZ-03), Jeb Hensarling (TX-05), Mike Pence (IN-06), and Paul Ryan (WI-01) have never wavered in their commitment to free-market principles and have been major players in the Republican Study Committee. And of all the Republican governors in the country, Mark Sanford of South Carolina has the strongest record of fighting for limited government and economic freedom."
From Arnold to Cheney to Rudy -- it's hard to tell the difference between much of the '08 lineup and the '04 lineup. Of course, the goal is to present a diverse party to the public -- but this strategy does little to reinforce the message that this is a new up-and-coming GOP.
Conservatives, no doubt, will appreciate the inclusion of new leaders like Palin and Jindal -- but it does seem the Club has a point. ... Granted, the convention shouldn't become an RSC meeting, but a Flake, Pence, or Sanford might have been nice ...
The Club's press release closes with a quote from Club president Pat Toomey, who says: "We hope Senator McCain will broaden the list of speakers and demonstrate his commitment to reclaiming the mantle of fiscal conservatism for the GOP.”
|
|
|
Thursday, August 21, 2008 |
|
On the Road Again |
|
Posted by:
Tom DeLay at
11:01 AM |
Howdy Townhall Readers,
If you couldn’t already tell, I’ve been on a vacation/fact-finding trip up to the northern part of our beautiful country and unable to post. Sorry for that, but there will be more to come as my good friends Ken Blackwell and Bob Beauprez join their CCM activists in Denver to combat the liberals – even those too liberal to blend in - and as I head to St. Paul for the Republican convention. In the meantime, I hope you all enjoy the Olympics…and the conventions.
Keep the Faith, Tom DeLay
|
|
|
Thursday, August 21, 2008 |
|
Presidential Debate Details |
|
Posted by:
Matt Lewis at
9:20 AM |
|

The presidential campaigns issued a joint statement this morning, outlining the presidential debates:
ARLINGTON, VA -- Today, the McCain and Obama campaigns released the following statement on the Presidential debates:
"The Barack Obama and John McCain campaigns have agreed to hold three presidential debates and one vice presidential debate in September and October sponsored by the Commission on Presidential Debates. The campaigns have come to the earliest agreement on presidential debates reached in any general election in recent history. This announcement reflects the presidential campaigns' agreement on dates, locations, and the formats for the fall debates. Campaign-appointed debate negotiators House Democratic Caucus Chairman Rahm Emanuel (D-IL) and Senator Lindsey Graham (R-SC) said they were pleased to have reached an early agreement to provide the American people with the opportunity to see and hear the candidates debate the critical issues facing the country. The two campaigns have accepted sponsorship of the debates by the Commission on Presidential Debates, subject to the debates being conducted under the terms of their agreement."
Summary Of McCain-Obama Debate Agreement:
The two campaigns agreed today on a framework for four General Election debates, to be sponsored by the Commission on Presidential Debates. Key elements of the agreement are:
1. First Presidential Debate:
- Date: September 26 - Site: University of Mississippi - Topic: Foreign Policy & National Security - Moderator: Jim Lehrer - Staging: Podium debate - Answer Format: The debate will be broken into nine, 9-minute segments. The moderator will introduce a topic and allow each candidate 2 minutes to comment. After these initial answers, the moderator will facilitate an open discussion of the topic for the remaining 5 minutes, ensuring that both candidates receive an equal amount of time to comment
2. Vice Presidential Debate
- Date: October 2nd - Site: Washington University (St. Louis) - Moderator: Gwen Ifill - Staging/Answer Format: To be resolved after both parties' Vice Presidential nominees are selected.
Read More... |
|
|
Thursday, August 21, 2008 |
|
Uff-Dah! Ken Conrad's Special Deal, Dontchaknow ... |
|
Posted by:
Matt Lewis at
8:39 AM |
Common Sense Issues has launched a new radio ad about North Dakota Senator Kent Conrad's VIP Countrywide loan for a beach "mansion" in Delaware. You gotta love the accents ...
What is even more interesting is that Senator Conrad -- who won't be up for re-election for four years -- responded to the ad with a paid advertisement of his own -- and also called into the conservative talk show they were advertising on and try to dispel the issue. Very interesting ...
|
|
|
Thursday, August 21, 2008 |
|
Is Rudy Off Key? |
|
Posted by:
Matt Lewis at
8:26 AM |
|
Dan Flynn thinks it's a mistake to give Rudy Giuliani the keynote address spot at the GOP convention:
"Shouldn't a convention keynote address be delivered by someone representing the future of a party? Democrats get this. Ann Richards gave a fiery keynote speech in 1988. Two years later, she was governor of Texas. Barack Obama delivered the keynote in 2004. Four years later....
Rather than elevate fresh talent, Republicans awarded the coveted keynote slot to Rudy Giuliani, a sixtysomething cancer and combover survivor who last held elective office more than six years ago. He balked at taking on Hillary. He bombed in this year's Republican primaries. And now he's the keynote speaker?"
|
|
|
Wednesday, August 20, 2008 |
|
Daley On The Ayers-Obama Friendship |
|
Posted by:
Hugh Hewitt at
11:21 PM |
The Mayor of Chicago:
"People keep trying to align [Bill Ayers] with Barack Obama. It's really unfortunate. They're friends. So what? People do make mistakes in the past. You move on. This is a new century, a new time. He reflects back and he’s been making a strong contribution to our community."
This won't fly because as recently as last fall Ayers was filmed ranting about the fascist America of today. Ayers is an unrepentant terrorist, and Obama's friendship with him calls the nominee's judgment into question, no matter what "contribution" the terrorist has made to his community.
As many have pointed out, this is like a Republican buddying up with Eric Rudolph. Both Ayers and Rudolph are terrorists, and both have never repented or sought to make amends to their victims.
Here's the video of Bill as the SDS Teddy Bear Picnic:
|
|
|
|
|
|
Your Blog Postings:
|
|
Last updated 3 Minutes 56 Seconds Ago
|
|
Last updated 9 Minutes 30 Seconds Ago
|
|
Last updated 9 Minutes 39 Seconds Ago
|
|
Last updated 14 Minutes 5 Seconds Ago
|
|
Last updated 18 Minutes 14 Seconds Ago
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Archives Archives
|
|
| | | |