Sitting here watching Sarah Palin debate Joe Biden, the words of columnist Kathleen
Parker are ringing in my ears: “(Palin) can't string two sentences together.”
Boy, now that Gov. Palin has finally appeared in the much-hyped vice-presidential
debate, I wonder if Kathleen is wishing she could take those words back.
The normally reliable conservative writer stunned readers and angered my radio
audience when she wrote a scathing column the other day suggesting that Gov. Palin
should drop out of the race “for the good of the country.” Parker parroted the mantra of
the left by saying that Palin is out of her league and should step aside.
On my radio show today, Parker defended her column. Feisty and a bit combative, she
reiterated her belief that Gov. Palin is a lightweight who wasn't “properly vetted” and
ought to fade away into the sunset, clearing the way, as she put it, for Mitt Romney to
become Sen. McCain's running mate.
I'm still getting angry emails over Kathleen's appearance and expect I will continue to
for quite a while.
Kathleen Parker's unexpected tirade took a lot of us by surprise. Then again, it's not
the first time a woman has taken an unpredictable turn.
I never have pretended to understand women. Over the course of my marriage, I found
myself wondering why my wife seemed to truly feel that yes meant no and no meant
yes. I often could simply not figure her out, hard as I tried.
Maybe this bizarre contempt that Kathleen Parker has demonstrated for Sarah Palin is
one of those mysterious aspects of being a woman.
In one ten minute phone conversation, Parker went from saying that she “love(d)” Gov.
Palin to the mean-spirited line about Palin not being able to string a pair of sentences
together. How in the world can someone love someone who is believed to be an
imbecile, incapable of even speaking in complete sentences?
Naturally, that doesn't make any sense. Very little of Kathleen Parker's smear of Palin
does.
That's why I'm back to thinking it must be a woman thing. And I said so on my radio
show. Immediately, female callers from all over the country flooded my phone lines
with agreement.
“Some women are catty this way”, said Ellen from Philadelphia. “Especially competitive
women. They hate seeing someone like Sarah Palin get elevated ahead of them in any
way.”
Kathy from Los Angeles called to say that she worked with a couple of women who
behaved like Kathleen Parker did today. “The more accomplished and popular and
beautiful the woman in question was, the more the other ladies hated her. They resent
other women who are poised, self-confident and clearly comfortable in their own skin.”
A South Carolina caller said that I nailed it. “I have always suspected many women are
simply jealous of Sarah Palin”, said Debbie. “It's irrational and unreasonable, but they
are envious of this wonderful and inspiring lady.”
Again, I don't presume to understand any of that. Women are mysterious objects and
I'm clearly not qualified to figure them out. I sure as heck remain baffled over columnist
Kathleen Parker stepping off the curb on this one.
But no one who watched tonight's debate could suggest that Sarah Palin is incapable of
smart, intelligent, articulate dialogue. Even in the tough environment of a televised
debate with such high stakes, Gov. Palin was charming, charismatic, witty, folksy and
captivating.
And you know what no one seems to be acknowledging? Americans realize that Gov.
Palin has been getting a crash course on running for national office these past few
weeks since she was tapped by John McCain to be his running mate. We don't expect
her to sound like an inside-the-beltway politician. We accept that she's new to this.
Despite her wildly popular approval rating as the governor of Alaska, we know that she's
brand new to this process. Continued... |